Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-05-01 Thread Hilmar Preusse
tags 477160 + fixed-upstream stop On 25.04.08 Karl Berry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Stefan, So maybe we can just remove it from the binary distribution, but keep the sources in the CVS so that people who use the script can still download it? Sounds good to me. So can you

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-27 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Hi Karl, Sounds good to me. So can you apply the patch below (or similar) to your source for your next release? I checked it in to TL for now. Thanks for the patch; I've applied it to the CVS. (By the way, are you planning an xdvik release any time soon, or should we plan on going with

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-24 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Stefan, So maybe we can just remove it from the binary distribution, but keep the sources in the CVS so that people who use the script can still download it? Sounds good to me. So can you apply the patch below (or similar) to your source for your next release? I checked it in to

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-23 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Karl Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... and I am wondering whether xdvizilla is useful at all for anything Seems like it could be removed to me, but this is a question for the xdvi maintainers. Stefan, I see you're on this list ... ? I just made a few tests with opening files from

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-22 Thread Karl Berry
... and I am wondering whether xdvizilla is useful at all for anything Seems like it could be removed to me, but this is a question for the xdvi maintainers. Stefan, I see you're on this list ... ? karl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.