Bug#477806: Any updates on this bug?

2009-04-27 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Rogério Brito schrieb: I'm not sure right now, but I think that some functions of lame (OK, not packaged in Debian) and lossywav (still not packaged) might benefit from a Fast Fourier Transform. I have prepared djbft packages in the pkg-multimedia SVN that are ready for upload IMHO. I

Bug#477806: Any updates on this bug?

2009-04-27 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Fabian. On Apr 27 2009, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Rogério Brito schrieb: I'm not sure right now, but I think that some functions of lame (OK, not packaged in Debian) and lossywav (still not packaged) might benefit from a Fast Fourier Transform. I have prepared djbft packages in the

Bug#477806: Any updates on this bug?

2009-04-27 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Rogério Brito schrieb: Nice to know that. Oh, just one thing (I have not checked the svn repo yet): are you compiling djbfft as a shared object? I tried out the Gentoo patch which builds the library into a shared onject (and it works fine), but I decided against it because (1) the djbfft

Bug#477806: Any updates on this bug?

2009-04-25 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Rogerio Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes: Is there any progress on this? Any updates? Is there a package that actually and actually benefits from djbfft? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#477806: Any updates on this bug?

2009-04-25 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi. On Apr 25 2009, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Rogerio Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes: Is there any progress on this? Any updates? Is there a package that actually and actually benefits from djbfft? I'm not sure right now, but I think that some functions of lame (OK, not packaged in Debian)