I reported a problem upgrading from ubuntu dapper to hardy where
printing to an ethernet-connected HP Laserjet 2200 using a PrintSir
using LPR/LPD protocol always fails. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225603
I didn't get a response, so finally decided to run a sniffer trace when
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
reran the print job with the correct kernel (for control reasons) and
received
the same results: tcp_frto=1 no print. tcp_frto=0 I can print. Attached
is
the output of tcpdump
uname -r =
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 01:26:59 +0300 (EEST)
[PATCH] [TCP] FRTO: SACK variant is errorneously used with NewReno
I applied this with a minor coding style fixup.
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 01:26:59 +0300 (EEST)
+static int
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Snip
Could you next try with tcp_frto set to 1, if my theory proves to be
correct, it too should be enough to fix the problem (in this
particular case). Of course you can verify the patch below too if you
want to, the patch should allow cups-printer to work with
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Snip
Could you next try with tcp_frto set to 1, if my theory proves to be
correct, it too should be enough to fix the problem (in this
particular case). Of course you can verify the patch below too if you
want to, the patch should allow cups-printer to work with
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
SNIP
Could you next try with tcp_frto set to 1, if my theory proves to be
correct, it too should be enough to fix the problem (in this
particular case). Of course you can verify the patch below too if you
want to, the patch should allow cups-printer to work with
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
SNIP
Could you next try with tcp_frto set to 1, if my theory proves to be
correct, it too should be enough to fix the problem (in this particular
case). Of course you can verify the patch below too if you want to, the
patch
Added Cc netdev (=linux network developers list).
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
So the problem was 100% reproducable for you with FRTO (I'm still catching
up the details here :-))?
Yes, 100% reproducible if you turn FRTO = 2. Printing works as it is
8 matches
Mail list logo
