Given what Markus said:
> Note that communication _among_ machines with different endianness,
> assuming that they all have the same byte layout, should work, too,
> with the current binary protocol. At least if you do not mix 32/64bit
> machines there...
I'm going to compile bin-prot for the o
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:20:21PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > - If you have patches either to make bin-prot big-endian or to excise
> > those bits of core that depend on bin-prot, then I'll take them, or
> > try to help.
> I haven't yet attacked the big-endian bits, but I'm working on a p
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:20:21PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:42:24PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > - We think 'core' is a bit too generic a name and risks some
> > confusion. If you would like to coordinate with us, then we can
> > decide on a different name.
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:42:24PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> - We think 'core' is a bit too generic a name and risks some
> confusion. If you would like to coordinate with us, then we can
> decide on a different name. (corelib? janestcore? - I admit I don't
> have a good suggestion).
Same pr
A few other points, from the Fedora point of view.
- We think 'core' is a bit too generic a name and risks some
confusion. If you would like to coordinate with us, then we can
decide on a different name. (corelib? janestcore? - I admit I don't
have a good suggestion).
- For the description, you
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:30:50PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> I don't know if you realised, but you'll need 'res' too:
> http://www.ocaml.info/home/ocaml_sources.html#RES
Yes I did, see #479238, but thanks anyhow for pointing it out :)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ...
I don't know if you realised, but you'll need 'res' too:
http://www.ocaml.info/home/ocaml_sources.html#RES
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ adding back the Cc to the bug report ]
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:01:17PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:13:50AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > * Package name: core
>
> This package name is a little bit too generic. Better one may be
> ocaml-core.
"core" is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: core
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Jane Street Holding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ocaml.janestcapital.com/?q=node/13
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: O
9 matches
Mail list logo
