On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:28:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:56:27PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
As for the timeframe, I have 5.10.0-11 just about ready with the fix
(and several others), but I'm still waiting for input from Brendan on
a few things. Brendan, I hope
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:56:27PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
As for the timeframe, I have 5.10.0-11 just about ready with the fix
(and several others), but I'm still waiting for input from Brendan on
a few things. Brendan, I hope you got [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
There was no update so I intend to NMU
tag 479698 fixed-upstream
thanks
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 02:16:21PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:01:13PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:27:26PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
Any timeframe for a fix?
The patch isn't applied upstream yet, probably
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:27:26PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
Any timeframe for a fix?
The patch isn't applied upstream yet, probably because there were concerns
about it creating a memory leak.
So it is a decision between leaked references or too less references.
Are you sure that the later,
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:01:13PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:27:26PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
Any timeframe for a fix?
The patch isn't applied upstream yet, probably because there were concerns
about it creating a memory leak.
So it is a decision between
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 06:52:17PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:11:00PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
Note to self: don't be so sure next time.
This patch from the upstream ticket is enough to make the whole SVK test
suite pass for me. There's not much point in working
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:11:00PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
Note to self: don't be so sure next time.
This patch from the upstream ticket is enough to make the whole SVK test
suite pass for me. There's not much point in working around the bug in
PerlIO::via::dynamic anymore, so closing the
tag 479698 patch
forwarded 479698 http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=54934
close 483516
thanks
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:16:31PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: perl
Version: 5.10.0-9
Severity: important
tag 479698 - help
clone 479698 -1
reassign -1 libperlio-via-dynamic-perl 0.12-1
severity -1 wishlist
retitle -1 workaround for memory corruption with Perl 5.10.0
tag -1 patch
forwarded -1 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=36260
submitter -1 !
thanks
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:16:31PM
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: perl
Version: 5.10.0-9
Severity: important
Several tests of the svk package fails reproducible with several different
glibc internal free checks like invalid pointer or corrupted
double-linked
list. Many of the calls
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:22:06AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Several tests of the svk package fails reproducible with several different
glibc internal free checks like invalid pointer or corrupted
double-linked
list. Many of
tag 479698 help
thanks
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: perl
Version: 5.10.0-9
Severity: important
Several tests of the svk package fails reproducible with several different
glibc internal free checks like invalid pointer or corrupted
double-linked
Package: perl
Version: 5.10.0-9
Severity: important
Several tests of the svk package fails reproducible with several different
glibc internal free checks like invalid pointer or corrupted double-linked
list. Many of the calls seems to go through swig, so maybe this problem is
located there.
|
13 matches
Mail list logo
