Bug#479708: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#479708: ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor

2010-03-02 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:53:23AM +0100, Hector Romojaro wrote: > Hi Marcelo, > > Sorry for the delay, I've been talking with the upstream authors of both > dotlrn and openacs about using the xinha debian package instead of > providing their own one. They are using at least two own xinha plugins,

Bug#479708: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#479708: ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor

2010-03-01 Thread Hector Romojaro
Hi Marcelo, Sorry for the delay, I've been talking with the upstream authors of both dotlrn and openacs about using the xinha debian package instead of providing their own one. They are using at least two own xinha plugins, and may have modified others as well. Should i join pkg-javascript to ta

Bug#479708: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#479708: ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor

2010-02-11 Thread Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal)
Hi Mathieu, > Currently, it is on SVN > (http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/ext-maint/xinha/#_ext-maint_xinha_). > I can migrate to git. Are there some guidelines? Here http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git#ConvertaSVNAliothrepositorytoGit > I have requested to join pkg-javascript on alioth (l

Bug#479708: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#479708: ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor

2010-02-11 Thread Mathieu Parent
Hi Marcelo Jorge, On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > >> But I won't do this alone and I want the package to be >> team-maintained. I'm cc-ing the maintainers of the packages. Maybe we >> should create a team for this and for other html editors an

Bug#479708: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#479708: ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor

2010-02-10 Thread Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal)
Hi Mathieu, > But I won't do this alone and I want the package to be > team-maintained. I'm cc-ing the maintainers of the packages. Maybe we > should create a team for this and for other html editors and js things > (libjs-scriptaculous, libjs-prototype, tinymce, ...). Why not the > "Debian Javasc