severity 479709 grave
thanks
Not sure whether the severity is correct, but this time the bug hit me
with a dataloss and I suppose that others might/will experience the
same. I doubt it's a good idea to have this kernel in Lenny, especially
with the patch being that easy.
Michael
--
Michael
severity 479709 important
close 479709 2.6.26-1
thanks
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
Not sure whether the severity is correct,
No. There are many system which don't choke on this.
I doubt it's a good idea to have this kernel in Lenny, especially
with
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
Not sure whether the severity is correct,
No. There are many system which don't choke on this.
Right, but there are also many systems choking. And they are all in the
risk of losing data.
The patch is applied upstream for
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 01:49:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
And they are all in the
risk of losing data.
Please explain. Data not reaching the disk is something which can't be
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:39:01PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
And they are all in the
risk of losing data.
Please explain. Data not reaching the disk is something which can't be
avoided in a crash situation. Data loss in the kernel context
5 matches
Mail list logo
