On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:32:36PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
i would like to see the qt, gtk, and webkit.org webkit libraries
merge at some point.
Regardless of whether this was ever feasible or not, both Qt and
Chromium have left the WebKit project, so I guess we can close this
bug?
On Sunday 09 February 2014 18:44:58 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014 22:03:58 Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:32:36PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
i would like to see the qt, gtk, and webkit.org webkit libraries
merge at some point.
On Sunday 09 February 2014 18:44:58 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014 22:03:58 Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:32:36PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
i would like to see the qt, gtk, and webkit.org webkit libraries
merge at some point.
On Sunday 09 February 2014 22:03:58 Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:32:36PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
i would like to see the qt, gtk, and webkit.org webkit libraries
merge at some point.
Regardless of whether this was ever feasible or not, both Qt and
Chromium have
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:44:58PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
That being said, I would **love** to see Qt using the system
webkit/whatever.
I don't see how this is even possible. WebKitGTK+ and WebKitQt are
not just API layers on top of WebCore (which is where the bulk
On Sunday 09 February 2014 22:59:13 Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:44:58PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
That being said, I would **love** to see Qt using the system
webkit/whatever.
I don't see how this is even possible. WebKitGTK+ and WebKitQt are
i would like to see the qt, gtk, and webkit.org webkit libraries merge
at some point. does debian really want to maintain and support three
(mostly) duplicate code bases?
obviously this would be a goal for all of the webkit upstreams to
undertake. maybe debian should make a statement or request
severity 479851 wishlist
tag 479851 wontfix
thanks
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:52:12PM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
reopen 479851
reassign 479851 webkit
retitle reintroduce qtwebkit shipped from webkit.org
thanks
It seems some people want to have QtWebKit shipped from webkit.org in Debian
Hi,
please discuss with upstream people and inform yourself before making
assumption. There's no good reason to ship both version or to ship QtWebKIT
from webkit.org. QtWebKit shipped with Qt is the version to be shipped as
recommended by TT.
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
reopen 479851
reassign 479851 webkit
retitle reintroduce qtwebkit shipped from webkit.org
thanks
It seems some people want to have QtWebKit shipped from webkit.org in Debian
archive with QtWebKit shipped from Qt.
Well, I can't stop them as i think it's useless, so i I reopen/reassign to
Wait just a minute here; this should not be so readily dismissed. The
libwebkit* were only recently renamed from libwebkitgtk*. Since WebKit
itself is not toolkit-specific, could that renaming please be reverted?
Additionally, there's no reason why the Trolltech version and the WebKit.org
Package: qt4-x11
Version: 4.4.0~rc1-5
Severity: important
qt4-xll should use the already-packaged libwebkit-1.0 library, rather than
repackaging webkit separately.
this has a couple major advantages. it reduces duplicated data (on the
debian archives, on the user's system, and in memory).
12 matches
Mail list logo
