Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
>
>> Eric Valette wrote:
>>
>>> Alexander Sack wrote:
>>>
reopen 480534
thanks
>>> I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
>>> gcc-3* installed.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Eric Valette wrote:
> > Alexander Sack wrote:
> >> reopen 480534
> >> thanks
>
> > I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
> > gcc-3* installed.
>
> Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-e
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Eric Valette wrote:
> > Alexander Sack wrote:
> >> reopen 480534
> >> thanks
>
> > I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
> > gcc-3* installed.
>
> Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-e
Eric Valette wrote:
> Alexander Sack wrote:
>> reopen 480534
>> thanks
> I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
> gcc-3* installed.
Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension
install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth
reopen 480534
thanks
Ok, thanks for the info.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Hi alexander. Thanks for your quick tentative fix. Unfortunately, It
> still does not work on my amd64 system. I do not know how to reopen the
> bug and do not want to create a new one.
Hi alexander. Thanks for your quick tentative fix. Unfortunately, It
still does not work on my amd64 system. I do not know how to reopen the
bug and do not want to create a new one. 480534-reopen?
If I can send you any file you would like to have. As I created a
temporary account to test in a sane
6 matches
Mail list logo