Hi,
I will submit you a cleaner one soon :)
Attached is an updated patch which works with version 0.6.9-3. This
one should be ok to be sent upstream.
Regards,
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
--- wpasupplicant-0.6.9/debian/control 2009-09-06 12:16:07.0 +0200
+++
On Monday 12 May 2008 00:25:51 Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
Hi,
I think that this:
libpcap-dev [kfreebsd], libbsd [kfreebsd]
should be:
libpcap-dev [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64], libbsd [kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64]
oops
What do you think?
You are right, we have to
Hi,
What about the comments made by upstream Developer?
yes, i saw them. They are right, my patch is not ready to be applied
upstream.
I will submit you a cleaner one soon :)
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
tags 480572 pending
thanks
(BCC'd control server)
On Sunday 30 September 2007 04:39:15 Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: important
Hi,
The current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD due to linux
specific build options.
The attached
Hi,
I think that this:
libpcap-dev [kfreebsd], libbsd [kfreebsd]
should be:
libpcap-dev [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64], libbsd [kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64]
oops
What do you think?
You are right, we have to enumarate the archs.
Thanks.
M.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: important
Hi,
The current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD due to linux
specific build options.
The attached patch fix the FTBFS and makes the package working
fine on kfreebsd.
I will be glad if you can include it.
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel
6 matches
Mail list logo
