Bug#484472: tun interface for l2tpns does not route as expected

2008-06-04 Thread Colin Alston
Package: l2tpns Version: 2.1.21-1 Severity: important l2tpns does not appear to route packets from/to ranges not within that which is allocated to the tunnels themselves. Consider for example [E:192.168.0.0/24]--[LAC:10.0.0.2]---[LNS:10.0.0.1]--[E:192.168.1.0/24] It seems l2tpns will only

Bug#484472: tun interface for l2tpns does not route as expected

2008-06-04 Thread Colin Alston
Jonathan McDowell wrote: l2tpns will only route traffic over the tun interface if it knows about the appropriate IPs. How do you expect it to know which end point to route to otherwise? You don't supply any details of your RADIUS config but at a guess you haven't got a Framed-Route entry for the

Bug#484472: tun interface for l2tpns does not route as expected

2008-06-04 Thread Colin Alston
Colin Alston wrote: I don't have a Frame-Route, no. From RADIUS documentation that attribute suggests it is a route to pass along to the LAC. I'm guessing l2tpns does not document its treatment of that attribute, or I'm blind. Apparently I am blind, and stupid. I do need a Framed-Route

Bug#484472: tun interface for l2tpns does not route as expected

2008-06-04 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:03:48AM +0200, Colin Alston wrote: Package: l2tpns Version: 2.1.21-1 Severity: important l2tpns does not appear to route packets from/to ranges not within that which is allocated to the tunnels themselves. Consider for example

Bug#484472: tun interface for l2tpns does not route as expected

2008-06-04 Thread Jonathan McDowell
severity wishlist retitle documentation could do with much improvement thanks On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:01:08PM +0200, Colin Alston wrote: Colin Alston wrote: I don't have a Frame-Route, no. From RADIUS documentation that attribute suggests it is a route to pass along to the LAC. I'm