Bug#487546: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#487546: cdbs: class/langcore.mk should set CC=gcc if CC is not set

2009-06-21 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
2009/6/17 Martin-Éric Racine : > In the case where an upstream tarball comes with a single C file and > no Makefile, the only option a maintainer has is to create a manual > build target in debian/rules to compile the binary and to include > class/langcore.mk to always use the standard Debian build

Bug#487546: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#487546: cdbs: class/langcore.mk should set CC=gcc if CC is not set

2009-06-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 10:32:01 Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On Sunday 22 June 2008 18:11:39 Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> class/langcore.mk sets -g -Wall -O2 without checking whether CC can > >> actualy process these options. For inst

Bug#487546: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#487546: cdbs: class/langcore.mk should set CC=gcc if CC is not set

2009-06-17 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Sunday 22 June 2008 18:11:39 Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> class/langcore.mk sets -g -Wall -O2 without checking whether CC can actualy >> process these options. For instance, -g produces output that is partially >> GDB-specific. On most G

Bug#487546: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#487546: cdbs: class/langcore.mk should set CC=gcc if CC is not set

2009-06-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Sunday 22 June 2008 18:11:39 Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > class/langcore.mk sets -g -Wall -O2 without checking whether CC can actualy > process these options. For instance, -g produces output that is partially > GDB-specific. On most GNU software, autotools perform these check for us > and set CC