Bug#487630: SUCCESS after removal of 00tetex.cnf (was: Re: Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4))

2008-11-06 Thread Omer Zak
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:29 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: According to dpkg -S, 00tetex.cnf belongs to no package. The laptop has been running Debian Testing for few years (Sarge Testing, then Etch Testing, and now Lenny Testing), so it is

Bug#487630: SUCCESS after removal of 00tetex.cnf (was: Re: Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4))

2008-11-06 Thread Norbert Preining
On Do, 06 Nov 2008, Omer Zak wrote: I am glad to see that the general problem is being addressed and the answer is not just remove by hand the offending 00tetex.cnf file. As Hilmar pointed out. The *released* packages of teTeX didn't have this problem. You seem to have used intermediate or

Bug#487630: SUCCESS after removal of 00tetex.cnf (was: Re: Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4))

2008-11-05 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, /etc/texmf/fmt.d: total 28 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 16:10 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Nov 3 15:16 ..

Bug#487630: SUCCESS after removal of 00tetex.cnf (was: Re: Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4))

2008-11-05 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi all, /etc/texmf/fmt.d: total 28 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 16:10 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Nov 3 15:16 ..

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3

2008-11-03 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mo, 03 Nov 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Should be in /etc/texmf/metafont/misc/. What does kpsewhich modes.mf tell you? Isn't that the old bug that manual intervention *is* necessary if yoou purge tetex after the last installation of texlive? Best wishes Norbert

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3

2008-11-03 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mo, 03 Nov 2008, Omer Zak wrote: What is the bug number of that old bug - so that I can check if it is what has bitten me? Several, about 20 AFAIR, some of them are: #425803, #435156, #435081, #433889, #436235, #435719, #435081, #433889, #427032, probably most important:

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4)

2008-11-03 Thread Omer Zak
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 13:30 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: (pointer to instructions how to check for this bug and how to work around it - would be helpful as well) /usr/share/doc/texlive-common/NEWS.Debian.gz According to this document, no special action is needed. Just install

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4)

2008-11-03 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mo, 03 Nov 2008, Omer Zak wrote: I tried to do this (using aptitude). Did not work for me. When trying to reinstall texlive-base and texlive-base-bin, they did not properly configure themselves due to texlive-base-bin failure to reconfigure. Failure messages? Then I had aptitude

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3

2008-11-03 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 31.10.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Omer, $ ls -al /var/lib/tex-common/fmtutil-cnf/ total 32 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 31 16:57 . drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Oct 31 16:56 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13 Feb 20 2008 texinfo.list -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15 Sep 19 07:35

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4)

2008-11-03 Thread Omer Zak
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:43 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mo, 03 Nov 2008, Omer Zak wrote: I tried to do this (using aptitude). Did not work for me. When trying to reinstall texlive-base and texlive-base-bin, they did not properly configure themselves due to texlive-base-bin failure to

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3

2008-11-03 Thread Omer Zak
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 12:54 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mo, 03 Nov 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Should be in /etc/texmf/metafont/misc/. What does kpsewhich modes.mf tell you? Isn't that the old bug that manual intervention *is* necessary if yoou purge tetex after the last

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4)

2008-11-03 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, I DO NOT have texlive-omega installed. Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=fmtutil.cnf Content-Type: text/plain; name=fmtutil.cnf; charset=UTF-8 Cont ### This file was automatically generated by update-fmtutil. # # Please do not

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3

2008-11-03 Thread Omer Zak
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 12:34 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: $ grep -A3 omega $(kpsewhich --format='web2c files' fmtutil.cnf) omega omega - omega.ini lambda omega language.datlambda.ini Weird. Your /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf was not

Bug#487630: SUCCESS after removal of 00tetex.cnf (was: Re: Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3 (and version 2007.dfsg.2-4))

2008-11-03 Thread Omer Zak
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: omega omega - omega.ini lambda omega language.datlambda.ini Here is the omega. /etc/texmf/fmt.d: total 28 drwxr-xr-x 2

Bug#487630: Bug 487630 exists also in version 2007.dfsg.2-3

2008-10-31 Thread Omer Zak
In my laptop (which now has Debian Lenny installed), long time ago (when Etch was the testing release) I had various TeX packages, but they were uninstalled (without being purged). When trying to set up texlive-base-bin, fmtutil-sys failed for me. Using aptitude, I purged all relevant