On Do, 06 Nov 2008, Omer Zak wrote:
> I am glad to see that the general problem is being addressed and the
> answer is not just "remove by hand the offending 00tetex.cnf file".
As Hilmar pointed out. The *released* packages of teTeX didn't have this
problem. You seem to have used intermediate or t
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:29 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > According to dpkg -S, 00tetex.cnf belongs to no package. The
> > laptop has been running Debian Testing for few years (Sarge
> > Testing, then Etch Testing, and now Lenny Testing), so it
On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
> > > /etc/texmf/fmt.d:
> > > total 28
> > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 16:10 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Nov 3
On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> > > /etc/texmf/fmt.d:
> > > total 28
> > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 16:10 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Nov 3 15:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > omega omega - omega.ini
> > lambda omega language.datlambda.ini
> >
> Here is the omega.
>
> > /etc/texmf/fmt.d:
> > total 28
> >
5 matches
Mail list logo