On 2008-11-15 16:22, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote:
> I have adapted your patch to apply it against upgrading.dbk rev5525.
> Patch in attachment.
Thanks, it's in 5527 now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13/11/08 01:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this help simplify things?
Yes, it does.
There are a handful of copy-editing changes along the way.
Thank you.
I have adapted your patch to apply it against upgrading.dbk rev5525.
Patch in attachment.
--
Giovanni
patch.489132.5525.gz
Descri
I'm finding this discussion of apt/aptitude somewhat confusing.
I rendered the text to html, did a proof-read, and came up with
the attached patch against r5510.
Does this help simplify things?
There are a handful of copy-editing changes along the way.
Cheers
Vince
Index: upgrading.dbk
On 2008-11-13 09:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> please find a typo patch below (should be 'quite', but lets' avoid
> the issue entirely)
Thanks. Applied in 5510.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please find a typo patch below (should be 'quite', but lets' avoid
the issue entirely)
Index: upgrading.dbk
===
--- upgrading.dbk (revision 5506)
+++ upgrading.dbk (working copy)
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
Several bug
On 12/11/08 23:08, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
I took the liberty to write:
# apt-get install apt
or
# aptitude install aptitude
When the user would only install apt as it is its preferred package manager, he
should also install aptitude because, in the next step, aptitude must at least
be execu
tags 489132 +patch
tags 489132 +pending
thanks
Thanks, Giovanni. Your text is now in rev. 5505.
I took the liberty to write:
# apt-get install apt
or
# aptitude install aptitude
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last days I have tried to understand why apt/aptitude need to be upgraded first.
Based on what I have found, I propose the following note to be inserted as
section 4.5.4 of the release note:
"Several bug reports have shown aptitude and apt in etch are quiet often
unable to handle the upgrade t
On 26/10/08 15:47, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote:
With apt-get
Problems
- (1) several xserver-xorg-video* are removed from the system leaving it
without graphical interface when the system is concerned with the
drivers
that are removed.
The following procedure resolved t
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:53:12 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>I guess many new users are used to synaptic or aptitude. Personaly I
>think we can recommend to use apt-get, but should test upgrades with
>aptitude and synaptic too and solve/describe possible issues with them.
I am trying to collect informat
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2008-10-05 15:02, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> I've seen several reports that aptitude from etch is unable to dist-upgrade
>> to Lenny, it loops searching for a solution… so yes I believe that
>> recommending to upgrade aptitude first is a good idea.
>
> Can't we recomme
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2008-10-05 15:02, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I've seen several reports that aptitude from etch is unable to dist-upgrade
> > to Lenny, it loops searching for a solution… so yes I believe that
> > recommending to upgrade aptitude first is a good ide
On 2008-10-05 15:02, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I've seen several reports that aptitude from etch is unable to dist-upgrade
> to Lenny, it loops searching for a solution… so yes I believe that
> recommending to upgrade aptitude first is a good idea.
Can't we recommend use of apt-get? It seems to wor
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> I recently tested an upgrade to lenny by doing an apt-get update,
> apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist-upgrade run (like I'm used to) without any
> problems. I guess apt gets upgraded in the apt-get upgrade run.
>
> Do you think mentioning that upgrading
Hi
I recently tested an upgrade to lenny by doing an apt-get update,
apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist-upgrade run (like I'm used to) without any
problems. I guess apt gets upgraded in the apt-get upgrade run.
Do you think mentioning that upgrading apt/aptitude in the release notes
is necessary or th
15 matches
Mail list logo
