Am Mittwoch, den 23.07.2008, 03:17 +0200 schrieb Loïc Minier:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
I search a bit more in the internet and found as small confirmation
another bug report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225895
(remove unreproducable tag? of this bug;))
Thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 23.07.2008, 03:17 +0200 schrieb Loïc Minier:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
I search a bit more in the internet and found as small confirmation
another bug report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225895
(remove unreproducable tag? of this bug;))
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16727
Thanks; it's best to mention it ASAP in the Debian bug (or to set the
forwarded URL) when you forward bug upstreams. Let's continue the
conversation there.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
Hello Loïc,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.07.2008, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Loïc Minier:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16727
Thanks; it's best to mention it ASAP in the Debian bug (or to set the
forwarded URL) when you forward bug upstreams. Let's
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
I did this on 2008-07-16 12:08 which is short after I reported it
upstream. Please look at http://bugs.debian.org/489738 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=47;bug=489738
Ah, I usually Cc: the maintainer when sending bug commands; I
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
I search a bit more in the internet and found as small confirmation
another bug report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225895
(remove unreproducable tag? of this bug;))
Thanks for the pointer; could you please try the attached patch?
Didn't run
Hello Loïc,
Am Dienstag, den 15.07.2008, 22:45 +0200 schrieb Loïc Minier:
DBUS_VERBOSE=1 will have NO EFFECT unless your copy of D-Bus was
compiled with verbose mode enabled.
Oh right; could you please rebuild dbus with DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS
set to --enable-verbose-mode in your
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, den 16.07.2008, 10:23 +0200 schrieb Noèl Köthe:
dev-usb:*:10110:usera,userb,userc,userd,.. (very long list with 1411
users)
The fact that the list if very long could be the explanation; dunno.
I tested it again with a smaller group (78) and got the same
Hello Michael,
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2008, 01:03 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/hal.conf the group (from /etc/group) plugdev
gets the permission for the removal devices.
We are using LDAP for the account data and don't want to configure every
/etc/group on every
Hello Loïc,
Am Dienstag, den 08.07.2008, 17:21 +0200 schrieb Loïc Minier:
Version: 1.2.1-2
This version reenabled the userdb cache; does downgrading to an earlier
version help with your issue?
I downgraded to 1.2.1-1 from snapshots but still have the same problem.
Here is the strace
Hello Michael,
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2008, 01:03 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/hal.conf the group (from /etc/group) plugdev
gets the permission for the removal devices.
We are using LDAP for the account data and don't want to configure every
/etc/group on every
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:
dbus-daemon(1)
...
DBUS_VERBOSE=1 will have NO EFFECT unless your copy of D-Bus was
compiled with verbose mode enabled.
Oh right; could you please rebuild dbus with DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS
set to --enable-verbose-mode in your environment or in
tags 489738 unreproducible
thanks
Noel Köthe wrote:
Package: dbus
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: important
Hello,
in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/hal.conf the group (from /etc/group) plugdev
gets the permission for the removal devices.
We are using LDAP for the account data and don't want to configure
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008, Noel Köthe wrote:
Version: 1.2.1-2
This version reenabled the userdb cache; does downgrading to an earlier
version help with your issue?
Here is the strace of a starting dbus --system:
Could you try with DBUS_VERBOSE=1 in the env? You should see userdb
cache
14 matches
Mail list logo
