Philipp Matthias Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, but 2.5.139 already violates this rule. The following .jar-files
Yes, and as you may have noticed, I have already filed a serious bug
against JSPWiki because of this. Most likely JSPWiki will move back to
contrib, at least for now, as some
Florian Grandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you use 1)
- How do you get your deleted binaries back in during clean phase?
AFAIK clean target has to reverse all changes the build process
introduced.
Easiest way to do this is to move the libraries somewhere else for
build, and then back
Philipp Matthias Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Only in the final debian/jspwiki/ tree (but build with the original
.jar files)
2. Each time during the debian/rules run
3. Once in the .orig.tar.gz (the download is only availabe as .zip)
You can either modify the .orig.tar.gz not to
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:59:36PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Philipp Matthias Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Only in the final debian/jspwiki/ tree (but build with the original
.jar files)
2. Each time during the debian/rules run
3. Once in the .orig.tar.gz (the download
Hi Kalle,
Kalle Kivimaa schrieb:
You can either modify the .orig.tar.gz not to include the jars, or,
IMO a better choice, modify the building process to use the Debian
provided jars. I personally prefer keeping the orig.tar.gz as close to
the original as possible (for JSPWiki all the Debian
Hello!
Please cc: me on replies, since I'm not subsribed to this list.
I'm currently looking at JSPWiki, a wiki-system written in Java. Debian
(and [K]Ubuntu) contains a very old version: 2.5.139 vs. 2.6.3. While
trying to build a new package, I detected that JSPWiki contains a lot of
6 matches
Mail list logo
