On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:09:45AM +0100, Simon A. Boggis wrote:
Hi,
If not, I'm intending to move them cautiously across to a 2.6.26 to see
what happens - unfortunately this process is a little bit slow.
Hi Simon,
what are your test results for 2.6.26?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:09:45AM +0100, Simon A. Boggis wrote:
Hi,
If not, I'm intending to move them cautiously across to a 2.6.26 to see
what happens - unfortunately this process is a little bit slow.
Hi Simon,
what are your test results for 2.6.26?
Cheers,
Hi,
just to add a little more information, I've seen this bug again on an
identical set of hardware, running an identical (debian preseed
installed) copy of debian, also on the (now previous) version of the
testing kernel: 2.6.24-1-686. I've attached the log from IPMI serial
console attached.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:58:41PM +0100, Simon A. Boggis wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:57:36AM +0100, Simon A. Boggis wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-7
Severity: critical
Justification:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:57:36AM +0100, Simon A. Boggis wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-7
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
overflated severity, learn to set them.
one or two broken boxes doesn't mean the kernel is unusable on the
whole. but
maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:57:36AM +0100, Simon A. Boggis wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-7
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
overflated severity, learn to set them.
one or two broken boxes doesn't mean the kernel
6 matches
Mail list logo
