On Jul 17, Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it is. The alternative would be an strace64 package for the 3
> concerned architectures. I'll ponder about this option.
It's unacceptable to pull in libc6-amd64 just for this niche use case,
it's a 10 MB package!
The other alternative
clone 491167 -1
retitle -1 strace: please provide separate strace64 package
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:20:25PM +0200, Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
> strace pulls in libc6-amd64 on my systems which is useless on most of my
> current desktops (Pentium 2 at university, Se
Package: strace
Version: 4.5.16+cvs20080708-1
Severity: minor
strace pulls in libc6-amd64 on my systems which is useless on most of my
current desktops (Pentium 2 at university, Sempron at work and Athlon XP
at home).
Is this really necessary? I assume the purpose of libc6-amd64 - like
libc6-i68
3 matches
Mail list logo
