-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
If this problem is uncommon or only affects users with a deprecated setup,
let's not worry about it. GRUB 2 handles this in a completely different way,
so our effort is most likely not going to pay back.
I just upgraded to
also sprach Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.29.0014 +0200]:
debby:~# dmraid -r
[...]
I don't know enough about mdadm to determine whose fault is it.
But it seems this is really a corner case problem, and only
happens in a very specific situation. Therefore I'm lowering
severity.
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 08:39 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft:
also sprach Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.29.0014 +0200]:
debby:~# dmraid -r
[...]
I don't know enough about mdadm to determine whose fault is it.
But it seems this is really a corner case problem, and only
also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.29.1541 +0200]:
There are hopefully not many people who use the normal linux
software raid to get there fake hardwarwe raid controllers to
work.
One should hope dmraid never existed or will soon cease to exist.
--
martin |
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 15:50 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft:
also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.29.1541 +0200]:
There are hopefully not many people who use the normal linux
software raid to get there fake hardwarwe raid controllers to
work.
One should hope dmraid
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:01:31PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 15:50 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft:
also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.29.1541 +0200]:
There are hopefully not many people who use the normal linux
software raid to get there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
Please try:
mdadm -D -b /dev/md0
mdadm -D /dev/md0
debby:~# mdadm -D -b /dev/md0
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=1 spares=1
UUID=b36bed37:7b1ca284:5f985e7d:0ec83b51
debby:~# mdadm -D /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 22:36 +0200 schrieb Moritz Naumann:
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 25450 active sync /dev/dm-5
1 2542- spare /dev/dm-2
debby:~#
That's very strange.
Normally you
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:36:02PM +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
Please try:
mdadm -D -b /dev/md0
mdadm -D /dev/md0
debby:~# mdadm -D -b /dev/md0
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=1 spares=1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
I think the usual thing to find in that output are physical devices instead
of /dev/dm-X.
What other special things are in your setup that we should know about? Are
you using LVM / EVMS or something like that?
No
severity 491977 important
thanks
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:50:44PM +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
debby:~# cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
DEVICE /dev/mapper/pdc_*
DEVICE partitions
DEVICE /dev/sd*
DEVICE /dev/hd*
ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=1 spares=1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Felix Zielcke wrote:
Please see the message above in the report, The patch from Robert is in
1.96+20080724-2 not -1 which you have installed.
Ah, my bad. Thanks for the hint, Felix.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work with 1.96+20080724-2 either:
Am Sonntag, den 27.07.2008, 15:07 +0200 schrieb Moritz Naumann:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work with 1.96+20080724-2 either:
I just saw that PATH contains /usr/local before /usr, I always thought
it would be the other way round.
So please remove any old grub files lyning there around and maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Felix Zielcke wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 27.07.2008, 15:07 +0200 schrieb Moritz Naumann:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work with 1.96+20080724-2 either:
I just saw that PATH contains /usr/local before /usr, I always thought
it would be the other way
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 03:07:41PM +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
debby:~# /usr/sbin/grub-probe -t device /boot
/dev/md0
debby:~# /usr/sbin/grub-probe -t device /
/dev/md2
Does 'which grub-probe' return '/usr/sbin/grub-probe' ?
Running postinst hook script /usr/sbin/update-grub.
Searching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 03:07:41PM +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
debby:~# /usr/sbin/grub-probe -t device /boot
/dev/md0
debby:~# /usr/sbin/grub-probe -t device /
/dev/md2
Does 'which grub-probe' return
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:36:10AM +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
++ convert_default /dev/md0
+++ convert_raid1 /dev/md0
++ tmp_dev=/dev/dm-5
++ :
++ convert /dev/dm-5
++ test -e /boot/grub/device.map
++ GRUB_LEGACY_0_BASED_PARTITIONS=1
++ grub-probe --device-map=/boot/grub/device.map -t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
[..] Simply run from your build dir:
./grub-probe -t device /
./grub-probe -t device /boot
Instead of /dev/dm-X, it should print /dev/md0 or /dev/md2.
While this worked, installing the new grub-common package (from
Am Samstag, den 26.07.2008, 18:00 +0200 schrieb Moritz Naumann:
debby:~# dpkg-query -W -f '${Package} ${Status} ${Version}\n' grub\*
grub-common install ok installed 1.96+20080724-1
Am I missing something? Should I take additional measures before retrying?
Please see the message above in
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:39:15PM +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
Does this patch (for grub-common) fix the problem?
While the patch applies fine and I can compile using
./configure; make, I cannot rebuild the deb using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
[..] Simply run from your build dir:
./grub-probe -t device /
./grub-probe -t device /boot
Instead of /dev/dm-X, it should print /dev/md0 or /dev/md2.
It does :-) :
debby:~/grub2-1.96+20080704# ./grub-probe -t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert Millan wrote:
Does this patch (for grub-common) fix the problem?
While the patch applies fine and I can compile using
./configure; make, I cannot rebuild the deb using debuild:
debby:~/grub2-1.96+20080704# export LANG=en_US.UTF-8
From: Moritz Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About the md issue: The patch does not seem to fix it (assuming, after
'make install', invoking the the freshly built ./update-grub is the
right way to invoke it, and I'm also calling grub-probe the right way):
./configure; make install installs
From: Moritz Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debby:~/grub2-1.96+20080704# ./grub-probe -v -d /dev/dm-5
Urm sorry didn't see that you invoked it with ./
and update-grub just generates grub.cfg.
grub-install uses grub-probe.
grub-probe: error: Cannot find a GRUB drive for /dev/dm-5. Check your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Felix Zielcke wrote:
./configure; make install installs everything to /usr/local not /usr
and /usr is before /usr/local in PATH
update-grub is just a bash script which invokes some commands
I realized this, thanks for making me aware though. I
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-41
Severity: important
I'm unable to install any linux (kernel) security updates or any other
kernels at all. Whenever I try to installa new kernel image (and thus
run update-grub) I get this:
Running postinst hook script /usr/sbin/update-grub.
Searching for GRUB
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:42:10AM +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-41
Severity: important
I'm unable to install any linux (kernel) security updates or any other
kernels at all. Whenever I try to installa new kernel image (and thus
run update-grub) I get this:
27 matches
Mail list logo
