hello,
On 30/09/2009 Sheridan Hutchinson wrote:
/9/30 Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org:
c.) busybox should be a hard dependency on lvm2, or cryptsetup, as
INDISPENSABLE for people with encrypted LVM2's to be able to boot
no, lvm2, cryptsetup, mdadm, etc all can still be used without
hey,
i dropped most adresses in Cc: header as this discussion becomes more
and more offtopic.
On 30/09/2009 Sheridan Hutchinson wrote:
2009/9/30 maximilian attems m...@stro.at:
your box is simply broken if it does not foollow the debian reference,
which explicitly says that recommends have
/9/30 Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org:
c.) busybox should be a hard dependency on lvm2, or cryptsetup, as
INDISPENSABLE for people with encrypted LVM2's to be able to boot
no, lvm2, cryptsetup, mdadm, etc all can still be used without initramfs
on non-root partititions (or for lvm with
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Sheridan Hutchinson wrote:
/9/30 Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org:
c.) busybox should be a hard dependency on lvm2, or cryptsetup, as
INDISPENSABLE for people with encrypted LVM2's to be able to boot
no, lvm2, cryptsetup, mdadm, etc all can still be used without
2009/9/30 maximilian attems m...@stro.at:
your box is simply broken if it does not foollow the debian reference,
which explicitly says that recommends have to be installed.
and yes you have negletected the big warnings.
tweaking Debian boxes is fine as long as you understand what you change
5 matches
Mail list logo
