Bug#493206: [Debian] Re: Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-05 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Igor, can you comment on that? Ola, runlevel 4 does not have any special meaning in Red Hat. To me this is just a bug. Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Kir and others I have got this bug report for Debian. However I need to know the details why this is so. I can understand that runlevel 4 have some

Bug#493206: [Debian] Re: Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-05 Thread Igor Sukhih
Kir Kolyshkin wrote: Igor, can you comment on that? Ola, runlevel 4 does not have any special meaning in Red Hat. To me this is just a bug. Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Kir and others I have got this bug report for Debian. However I need to know the details why this is so. I can understand

Bug#493206: [Debian] Re: Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-05 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Thanks a lot for the answer! I'll update this on next upload so it will be corrected for debian Lenny. Best regards, // Ola On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:30:35PM +0400, Igor Sukhih wrote: Kir Kolyshkin wrote: Igor, can you comment on that? Ola, runlevel 4 does not have any special meaning in

Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Kir and others I have got this bug report for Debian. However I need to know the details why this is so. I can understand that runlevel 4 have some special meaning in redhad, but why isn't vzctl stopped in runlevel 0 1 and 6? Best regards, // Ola On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:51:40PM +0300,

Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-03 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Teodor Ok, I'll fix this in next upload. As lenny is frozen it is not likely that this will be accepted before that time anyway. Or do you think this is important enough for lenny? Best regards, // Ola On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:51:40PM +0300, Teodor wrote: Package: vzctl Version:

Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-03 Thread Teodor
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Teodor Ok, I'll fix this in next upload. As lenny is frozen it is not likely that this will be accepted before that time anyway. Or do you think this is important enough for lenny? As I've mentioned in the first

Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-03 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Thanks. Then I know your view. Best regards, // Ola On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 12:45:58PM +0300, Teodor wrote: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Teodor Ok, I'll fix this in next upload. As lenny is frozen it is not likely that this will be

Bug#493206: vzctl: doesn't start in runlevel 4 (by LSB headers)

2008-08-01 Thread Teodor
Package: vzctl Version: 3.0.22-9 Severity: normal Tags: patch The startup script /etc/init.d/vz is not executed in runlevel 4. It is a common practice on Debian to start the services in runlevels 2345 and stop it in runlevels 016. This patch should be enough: piti:~# diff /etc/init.d/vz