On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Steve Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Coffman wrote:
--- libnfsidmap-0.21/libnfsidmap.c~ 2008-08-02 10:52:00.289845221 +1200
+++ libnfsidmap-0.21/libnfsidmap.c 2008-08-02 10:47:50.647889312 +1200
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
char plgname[128];
Kevin Coffman wrote:
--- libnfsidmap-0.21/libnfsidmap.c~ 2008-08-02 10:52:00.289845221 +1200
+++ libnfsidmap-0.21/libnfsidmap.c 2008-08-02 10:47:50.647889312 +1200
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
char plgname[128];
int ret = 0;
- snprintf(plgname, sizeof(plgname), %s%s.so,
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Getting back to this. I'm curious if there is a specific reason why
the *.so symlink was not there? Adding the .0 shouldn't be
necessary. But there may be a reason for not including the .so
symlink that I am not aware of.
My default install in
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:41:04PM -0400, Kevin Coffman wrote:
A new version of libnfsidmap is now available from
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/libnfsidmap/libnfsidmap-0.21.tar.gz
Changes since libnfsidmap-0.20:
- The main library has been changed to load plugin libraries to
Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
that, but from what I saw, when you install in /usr/local/lib, libtool
knows better. If anyone has the answer on that, let me know.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
that, but from what I saw, when you install in /usr/local/lib, libtool
knows better. If anyone has the answer on that, let me know.
The convention on Debian seems to be to install
OK, I'll update the code and put out a -0.22 ASAP, but it might not be
for a few days.
BTW, this is the kind of comments I was looking for since putting the
beta out in April, but received none. I guess I was asking in the
wrong places. :-/
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Collins [EMAIL
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
that, but from what I saw, when you install in /usr/local/lib, libtool
9 matches
Mail list logo
