Package: gnome
Version: 1:2.20.2.4
Severity: minor
The dependency on gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg being versioned prevents the
gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg-full package from debian-multimedia.org from
satisfying it as dpkg doesn't do versioned Provides:. Is there any need
for the dependency to be versioned?
--
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008, James Andrewartha wrote:
The dependency on gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg being versioned prevents the
gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg-full package from debian-multimedia.org from
satisfying it as dpkg doesn't do versioned Provides:. Is there any need
for the dependency to be versioned?
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008, James Andrewartha wrote:
The dependency on gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg being versioned prevents the
gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg-full package from debian-multimedia.org from
satisfying it as dpkg doesn't do versioned Provides:. Is there any need
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008, Christian Marillat wrote:
Which bad practice ?
Introducing virtual packages of your choice by matters of Provides:
this breaks versionned dependencies in the Debian archive as your
packages (with the virutal provide) always
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008, Christian Marillat wrote:
Which bad practice ?
Introducing virtual packages of your choice by matters of Provides:
this breaks versionned dependencies in the Debian archive as your
packages (with the virutal provide) always satisfy the dependency, even
if the version
James Andrewartha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008, Christian Marillat wrote:
Which bad practice ?
Introducing virtual packages of your choice by matters of Provides:
this breaks versionned dependencies in the Debian archive as your
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008, James Andrewartha wrote:
No, the problem is dpkg doesn't support versioned Provides: and so the
dependency can never be satisfied even if the version is ok (which it is,
not that I think it should be versioned in this case).
Right, but the end result is that it
7 matches
Mail list logo
