tags 494287 pending
thanks
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:46:17AM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:33:11AM +1000, Peter Wright wrote:
On 08/08 17:54:42, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at
On 08/08 17:54:42, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:41:17PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't really want to make man-db depend on this version of
groff, though, as man doesn't require it during normal
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:33:11AM +1000, Peter Wright wrote:
On 08/08 17:54:42, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:41:17PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't really want to make man-db depend on this version
Package: man-db
Version: 2.5.2-2
Severity: normal
I noticed this problem when using lintian to test a custom package.
Running man with the --warnings option produces stderr as follows:
$ man --warnings bash /dev/null
/usr/bin/nroff: invalid option -wmac
$
It doesn't matter which
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 07:03:59PM +1000, Peter Wright wrote:
Package: man-db
Version: 2.5.2-2
Severity: normal
I noticed this problem when using lintian to test a custom package.
Running man with the --warnings option produces stderr as follows:
$ man --warnings bash /dev/null
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:41:17PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't really want to make man-db depend on this version of groff,
though, as man doesn't require it during normal operations. Could you
just upgrade groff? Perhaps lintian needs to check groff's version
number too?
Hmm, how long
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:41:17PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't really want to make man-db depend on this version of groff,
though, as man doesn't require it during normal operations. Could you
just upgrade groff?
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:54:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hmm, how long was this broken? I can't recall ever running into
this bug...
It was never broken in any given coherent release, but I have a
feeling that Peter
8 matches
Mail list logo
