Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-10-12 Thread Neil Brown
On Wednesday August 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current Debian sid kernel 2.6.26-2 does sync the disks if I add them. I tried now even the newer 2.6.27-rc3-git6 out, because it has a few MD changes. That one adds the disks only as `spare' but does not start a resync. I cannot

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-20 Thread Felix Zielcke
retitle 495580 Kernel doesn't start a resync after adding a disk. thanks Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2008, 20:28 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft: I don't follow you, sorry. If you want, you can try to restate your case in German. Thank you very much. You got me now on the right track. Sorry for the

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-19 Thread Felix Zielcke
tags 495580 - moreinfo thanks You need to tell me exactly what you did. What you describe is not possible. I don't contest you are seeing a problem, but I have done these steps hundreds of times without any problem ever. Ok, just did it now from scratch. I removed the 4 virtual disk .vmdk

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-19 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Montag, den 18.08.2008, 19:54 -0300 schrieb martin f krafft: You need to tell me exactly what you did. What you describe is not possible. I don't contest you are seeing a problem, but I have done these steps hundreds of times without any problem ever. As I found the bug I even didn't

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.08.19.0829 +0200]: fz-vm:~# mdadm -f /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1 mdadm: set /dev/sdc1 faulty in /dev/md0 fz-vm:~# mdadm -r /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1 mdadm: hot removed /dev/sdc1 fz-vm:~# mdadm -a /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1 mdadm: re-added /dev/sdc1 fz-vm:~#

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-19 Thread Felix Zielcke
Now that I think more about this, I think this is more wishlist then a bug. Though I don't have a better bug title yet in mind. So please feel free to change this. Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2008, 19:21 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft: Unless you waited for /dev/sdc1 to resync, removing /dev/sdd1

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-19 Thread martin f krafft
I don't follow you, sorry. If you want, you can try to restate your case in German. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-18 Thread Felix Zielcke
Package: mdadm Version: 2.6.7-3 Severity: important Hello, I played recently around with the Linux software RAID for grub2, I had never before that much to do with it so maybe I did something wrong. But in any case it shouldn't be that easy to get a broken RAID 10 :) It's more from my memory

Bug#495580: mdadm: 4 disk raid10 with 1 active and 3 spare possible

2008-08-18 Thread martin f krafft
tags 495580 moreinfo severity 495580 normal thanks also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.08.18.1542 -0300]: It's more from my memory and .bash_history now, I didn't do it now exactly that way again. You need to tell me exactly what you did. What you describe is not possible. I