On Wednesday August 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current Debian sid kernel 2.6.26-2 does sync the disks if I add
them.
I tried now even the newer 2.6.27-rc3-git6 out, because it has a few MD
changes.
That one adds the disks only as `spare' but does not start a resync.
I cannot
retitle 495580 Kernel doesn't start a resync after adding a disk.
thanks
Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2008, 20:28 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft:
I don't follow you, sorry. If you want, you can try to restate your
case in German.
Thank you very much. You got me now on the right track.
Sorry for the
tags 495580 - moreinfo
thanks
You need to tell me exactly what you did. What you describe is not
possible. I don't contest you are seeing a problem, but I have done
these steps hundreds of times without any problem ever.
Ok, just did it now from scratch.
I removed the 4 virtual disk .vmdk
Am Montag, den 18.08.2008, 19:54 -0300 schrieb martin f krafft:
You need to tell me exactly what you did. What you describe is not
possible. I don't contest you are seeing a problem, but I have done
these steps hundreds of times without any problem ever.
As I found the bug I even didn't
also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.08.19.0829 +0200]:
fz-vm:~# mdadm -f /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1
mdadm: set /dev/sdc1 faulty in /dev/md0
fz-vm:~# mdadm -r /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1
mdadm: hot removed /dev/sdc1
fz-vm:~# mdadm -a /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1
mdadm: re-added /dev/sdc1
fz-vm:~#
Now that I think more about this, I think this is more wishlist then a
bug.
Though I don't have a better bug title yet in mind.
So please feel free to change this.
Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2008, 19:21 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft:
Unless you waited for /dev/sdc1 to resync, removing /dev/sdd1
I don't follow you, sorry. If you want, you can try to restate your
case in German.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.6.7-3
Severity: important
Hello,
I played recently around with the Linux software RAID for grub2, I had never
before that much to do with it so maybe I did something wrong.
But in any case it shouldn't be that easy to get a broken RAID 10 :)
It's more from my memory
tags 495580 moreinfo
severity 495580 normal
thanks
also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.08.18.1542 -0300]:
It's more from my memory and .bash_history now, I didn't do it now
exactly that way again.
You need to tell me exactly what you did. What you describe is not
possible. I
9 matches
Mail list logo