Andreas Henriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The previous discussions has lead nowhere. No use in discussing it yet
again, instead it's time to act!
Put down that crack pipe. Now.
I offer to fix up all packages to exim4 | mail-transport-agent *and*
when there is a working default-mta
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=andreas%40fatal.se
Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is
generally
considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package providing
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:37:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Where did you discuss this mass filing of (useless) bugs before you
submitted them?
The previous discussions has lead nowhere. No use in discussing it yet
again, instead it's time to act!
In particular, these bugs are
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
I offer to fix up all packages to exim4 | mail-transport-agent *and*
Don't do it on any packages that tagged the bug wontfix, at least not
without asking first (AND getting a positive response). Some of the
packages have real reasons to prefer an
Package: sks
Severity: normal
Hello!
Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is generally
considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package providing
mail-transport-agent which has the highest priority.
Is there any particular reason why your package needs to
5 matches
Mail list logo
