Bug#498082: GNU mdoc vs UCB mdoc (was Re: Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages)

2008-09-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Colin Watson dixit: would mean that line/byte numbers would be wrong, which could be confusing. They are wrong anyway, as the macro packages count for byte numbers too, at least in the iconv example. But still a point: we could just wc the macro package first. mdoc; docj.tmac still has it,

Bug#498082: GNU mdoc vs UCB mdoc (was Re: Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages)

2008-09-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 07:57:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Colin Watson dixit: would mean that line/byte numbers would be wrong, which could be confusing. They are wrong anyway, as the macro packages count for byte numbers too, at least in the iconv example. But still a point: we