Bug#498082: GNU mdoc vs UCB mdoc (was Re: Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages)

2008-09-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 07:57:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Colin Watson dixit: > >would mean that line/byte numbers would be wrong, which could be > >confusing. > > They are wrong anyway, as the macro packages count for byte numbers > too, at least in the iconv example. But still a point:

Bug#498082: GNU mdoc vs UCB mdoc (was Re: Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages)

2008-09-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Colin Watson dixit: >would mean that line/byte numbers would be wrong, which could be >confusing. They are wrong anyway, as the macro packages count for byte numbers too, at least in the iconv example. But still a point: we could just wc the macro package first. >mdoc; docj.tmac still has it, co

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 06:56:07PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Colin Watson dixit: > >The Debian Policy Manual documents the current situation: > > > > Due to limitations in current implementations, all characters in the > > manual page source should be representable in the usual legacy >

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Colin Watson dixit: >Heh, you managed to find a case where it actually *was* a man-db bug >after all! I did say "almost never", I guess ... Happens ;-) >This is triggered by your use of UTF-8 characters that aren't just >recoded versions of ISO-8859-1 characters in comments at the top of the >ma

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-07 Thread Colin Watson
reassign 498082 man-db tags 498082 fixed-upstream thanks On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 08:27:06AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Colin Watson dixit: > >Please note that man-db is almost never the real source of this kind of > >bug > > Okay, I did not know which of the many components may be the source

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Colin Watson dixit: >Please note that man-db is almost never the real source of this kind of >bug Okay, I did not know which of the many components may be the source. >if you think the warning is incorrect, please reassign to >groff-base, not to man-db. (I've reassigned this one.) Thanks. >Cou

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:02:06AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Russ Allbery dixit: > >The error message is coming from man --warnings. It's possible that it > >may have some sort of problem. Can you double-check first that you have > >the most current man-db package? If so, I'll transfer the

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
reassign 498082 man-db thanks Russ Allbery dixit: >The error message is coming from man --warnings. It's possible that it >may have some sort of problem. Can you double-check first that you have >the most current man-db package? If so, I'll transfer the bug there. Oh okay. Sure. ii man-db

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > W: mircpio: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/mircpio.1.gz list > open at EOF! A .Bl directive has no matching .El > > I’ve got three manpages in mdoc(7) format with this error now. All of > them are valid (at least I think so), but hav

Bug#498082: lintian: false positive in manpages

2008-09-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: lintian Version: 1.24.2.1 Severity: normal W: mircpio: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/mircpio.1.gz list open at EOF! A .Bl directive has no matching .El I’ve got three manpages in mdoc(7) format with this error now. All of them are valid (at least I think so), but have