Bug#500176: set unbound does not run default by /etc/default/unbound (Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-11-15 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi all, On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:46:01 +0900 Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly. > > > > Using /etc/default/unbound is reasonable, I think. Some of daemon packages > > (e.g. rsync) are not started by default becaus

Bug#500176: set unbound does not run default by /etc/default/unbound (Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-11-10 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:16:53 +0900 Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly. > > Using /etc/default/unbound is reasonable, I think. Some of daemon packages > (e.g. rsync) are not started by default because it is set i

Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-09 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:07:00AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]: > > FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that > > bug of course. > [...] > > I don't think this is too hard to ask from someone t

Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]: > FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that > bug of course. [...] > I don't think this is too hard to ask from someone that is installing > multiple DNS softwares on the same machine. A bit more

Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-07 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:46:11 +0200 Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Agreed, that would be nice. While this is something to consider for > > squeeze release goals, how do we solve the problem for lenny? > > I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly.

Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-06 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:48:18AM +, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]: > > FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with > > apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none > > of them has a bu

Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-06 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]: > FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with > apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none > of them has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC. Uh, don't you think that marki

Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-01 Thread martin f krafft
reopen 500176 severity 500176 serious thanks This bug is actually release-critical because installation leaves the dpkg database in an unusable state. Please either conflict with other DNS servers, do not start it by default, bind it to 127.0.0.42, fail gracefully (which would not be ok, I think),