On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 06:57:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the unbound package:
#500176: It does not conflicts with bind and other ns daemons
It has been closed by Robert Edmonds [EMAIL
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
At least in three cases (ftpd, httpd, radius, telnetd) currently is
used a virtual package. So probably it is the most appropriate choice
in respect with current policy.
there are two protocol speaking over 53/udp; the recursive service
(rd==1) offered by
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:58:41PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
The point is that with the *default* configuration unbound does not
complete the installation when another name server is installed. And
this could be considered a serious bug.
ok. you would prefer that the unbound postinst
3 matches
Mail list logo