Bug#500535: libjdom0 vs. lenny

2008-10-20 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 500539 important thanks Thomas Viehmann wrote: > In order to be fixed for lenny, changing the libjdom0 must be done in a > way that is release compatible (in particular, no new upstream version). > If that cannot reasonably be done for lenny,

Bug#500535: libjdom0 vs. lenny

2008-10-19 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, just a quick note: the bug #500539 about phasing out libjdom0, blocked by the present and similar bugs, is currently labeled RC. In order to be fixed for lenny, changing the libjdom0 must be done in a way that is release compatible (in particular, no new upstream version). If that cannot reaso