[2019-03-16 16:29] Harald Dunkel
> I am running ext4 instead of reiserfs today, but logging fsck has still
> a *severe* impact on boot time performance. We have a few Debian file
> servers in the office, e.g. providing /home/* via NFS. They are managed
> remotely using some serial-over-line
I am running ext4 instead of reiserfs today, but logging fsck has still
a *severe* impact on boot time performance. We have a few Debian file
servers in the office, e.g. providing /home/* via NFS. They are managed
remotely using some serial-over-line technology instead of a vga console.
A few
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
[2008-10-07 22:10] Harald Dunkel
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Harald Dunkel]
> >
> >> Would it be possible to make running logsave optional?
> >
> > This is actually the calls to fsck, I believe, and it is already
> > optional if you want to use fsck by
[Harald Dunkel]
If I remove the logsave -s $FSCK_LOGFILE in checkroot.sh and
checkfs.sh, then my PC boots in 43sec instead of 55sec. Thats an
improvement of about 20% for just 2 partitions (/ and /home).
Filesystem on both partitions is reiserfs.
Interesting.
Would it be possible to make
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Harald Dunkel]
Would it be possible to make running logsave optional?
This is actually the calls to fsck, I believe, and it is already
optional if you want to use fsck by modifying /etc/fstab.
I don't want to drop fsck. I just would like to skip the logsave
5 matches
Mail list logo
