I think I have tracked this down. Could you try this patch for
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher (against 1.6.6.) and let me know.
Mark
diff --git a/apt-cacher b/apt-cacher
index 1fb7ab7..765b240 100755
--- a/apt-cacher
+++ b/apt-cacher
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ sub connect_curlm {
Package: apt-cacher
tag 501747 pending
thanks
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 02:27:11PM +0200, Guntsche Michael wrote:
On Oct 18, 2008, at 12:27, Mark Hindley wrote:
I think I have tracked this down. Could you try this patch for
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher (against 1.6.6.) and let me know.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:58:04 +0100, Mark Hindley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am afraid I can't reproduce this behaviour (admittedly I have the
apt-cacher version 1.6.6 which is still to be uploaded. If you want to
try it and see if it is any better you can get it from
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:26:03AM +0200, Michael Guntsche wrote:
I do not see anything fishy here but i KNOW that a while back I had the
full download speed (back then around 330K). So I do not understand what's
happening here.
Thanks. It basically looks fine, appart from the frequent read
Could you apply this patch to /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher and see
if it makes any difference?
Mark
diff --git a/apt-cacher b/apt-cacher
index 1fb7ab7..9d2e7b2 100755
--- a/apt-cacher
+++ b/apt-cacher
@@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ sub libcurl {
}
elsif ($pkfdref) {
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:19:40PM +0200, Michael Guntsche wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:04:07 +0100, Mark Hindley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I had thought your problem was with 1.6.4. The OP of ths bug identifies
1.6.4 as problematic. Is it fine for you?
1.6.4 is fine for me. Sorry for
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Michael Guntsche wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:28:54 +0100, Mark Hindley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you know which version gave you decent speed?
Hah, that was easier than I expected. 1.6.4 gives me decent performance, I
am not up to my
Hi,
I seem to have a similar problem. In my case apt-get update works
rather fast. If I then download a package via apt-get install I get a
download rate of 167K if I got directly to the same server (removing
the proxy entries in sources.list) I get around 560K of download. This
started
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:22:11PM +0200, Guntsche Michael wrote:
Hi,
I seem to have a similar problem. In my case apt-get update works rather
fast. If I then download a package via apt-get install I get a download
rate of 167K if I got directly to the same server (removing the proxy
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:53:25AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
package apt-cacher
found 501747 1.6.4
thanks
On 12-Oct-2008, Mark Hindley wrote:
Can you provide me with your apt-cacher version
=
$ aptitude show apt-cacher | grep '^Version:'
Version: 1.6.4
=
which mode are you
On 13-Oct-2008, Mark Hindley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:53:25AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
I don't know exactly which configuration setting determines that,
so here are all the configuration settings for ???apt-cacher???:
Thanks.
What does /etc/default/apt-cacher contain?
=
$
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 06:46:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
I wasn't aware that ???apt-cacher??? works as an HTTP proxy, I'd love to
know how to use it that way! I thought one needs to modify the
requested URLs in ???sources.list??? directly.
Yes, you could leave sources.list unchanged and
package apt-cacher
found 501747 1.6.4
thanks
On 12-Oct-2008, Mark Hindley wrote:
Can you provide me with your apt-cacher version
=
$ aptitude show apt-cacher | grep '^Version:'
Version: 1.6.4
=
which mode are you using (daemon, inetd or cgi)
I don't know exactly which configuration
13 matches
Mail list logo
