My fix would be for procps sysctl and init files to not be installed at
all. That way freebsd-utils is free to have its own init file. However
this may impact on your arch in ways I cannot see, so here is your time
to tell me if this will work for you. I won't be doing the fix as
suggested in
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:34:18AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
It looks like we (GNU/kFreeBSD) have to create better wrapper
around native /lib/freebsd/sysctl.
The current one does not accept file name for -p,
it always uses /etc/sysctl.conf and the possibly specified filename
treats as
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:34:18AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
It looks like we (GNU/kFreeBSD) have to create better wrapper
around native /lib/freebsd/sysctl.
The current one does not accept file name for -p,
it always uses /etc/sysctl.conf and the possibly specified filename
treats as
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of procps and are not subscribed to the BSD list,
so please include me in the replies.
I received this bug report saying there is another sysctl program out
there in a package called freebsd-utils and the procps init script is
calling it and failing. It would of been
Craig Small csm...@debian.org (07/01/2009):
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of procps and are not subscribed to the BSD list,
so please include me in the replies.
I hope it's enough through the bug?
Anyhow I cannot find this package anywhere! Packages.d.o doesn't have
it and what is real
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:22:04AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I hope it's enough through the bug?
It was, thanks.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Thanks to KiBi I've got the package. Next.
The problem is that procps has a sysctl and an init file. However,
freebsd-utils has a sysctl file too. These files are slightly
different.
My fix would be for procps sysctl and init files to not be installed at
all. That way freebsd-utils is free to
7 matches
Mail list logo
