Paul Wise ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc
Some more things:
Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a
review on
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed and uploaded again on mentors.
Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL
module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please
investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because:
Fair enough, I've uploaded the package.
Thanks for your work, please mail debian-mentors for future uploads
and I'll upload if I am able.
--
bye,
pabs
Paul Wise ha scritto:
Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL
module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please
investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add despite that.
Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because:
1) I can
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a LICENSE file, isn't it enough?
License and copyright holder are two different things. Licenses
specify what you are allowed to do with the work, the copyright holder
information tells you who is giving you a
Paul Wise ha scritto:
The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you
might want to ask them to fix that.
There is a LICENSE file, isn't it enough?
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.6-1.dsc
A review of your source package:
debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the
uscan manual page.
The upstream
Paul Wise ha scritto:
A review of your source package:
debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the
uscan manual page.
The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you
might want to ask them to fix that.
There is a new upstream version
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc
Some more things:
Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a
review on debian-l10n-english.
You don't specify
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upstream's license grant is unclear about the GPL version; either
version 3 of the License. doesn't make sense.
In addition, the Makefile and the source code say it is GPL v2 or
later. I think upstream should make up their
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mod-spamhaus.
* Package name: mod-spamhaus
Version : 0.5-1
Upstream Author : Luca Ercoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-spamhaus/
* License : GPL
Section : web
It
11 matches
Mail list logo
