Bug#503991: closed by Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#503991: debian policy requires the configurable files be under /etc)

2008-10-31 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:52:28PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: Why should the user have the need to edit/configure a script that is shipped by powersaved like wm_logout, beep_hi, beep_lo (this is true for all scripts that are shipped in /usr/lib/powersave/scripts). I don't see any, besides

Bug#503991: closed by Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#503991: debian policy requires the configurable files be under /etc)

2008-10-30 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
package powersaved reopen 503991 thanks On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:28:36AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Package: powersaved Version: 0.15.20-3 Severity: serious This severity is totally exagerrated. wishlist would have been much more

Bug#503991: closed by Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#503991: debian policy requires the configurable files be under /etc)

2008-10-30 Thread Michael Biebl
Stanislav Maslovski schrieb: package powersaved reopen 503991 thanks On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:28:36AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Package: powersaved Version: 0.15.20-3 Severity: serious This severity is totally exagerrated. wishlist would have

Bug#503991: closed by Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#503991: debian policy requires the configurable files be under /etc)

2008-10-30 Thread Michael Biebl
Stanislav Maslovski schrieb: Hello, I am writing you off-list because it seems that your reactions are motivated not by thinking, but emotions. It seems that the Thanks for implying that I was *not* thinking when I wrote this. (Don't take this remark too seriously) My aim was not to piss