* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:30:44 +0100]:
* Daniel Baumann [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:24:14 +0100]:
since the description clearly states that it is experimental, it's
better to have it in than out because it makes backporting easier
(limits interdiffs), gets more attention by people.
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 07:30:44PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Daniel Baumann [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:24:14 +0100]:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
I know Daniel doesn't agree, so I'll wait a couple days before
proceeding with the removal in case he wants to provide a good rationale
as for why
Hi there,
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since the description clearly states that it is experimental, it's
better to have it in than out because it makes backporting easier
(limits interdiffs), gets more attention by people.
Since the description states that it is experimental, it
btrfs-source package descripttion states, and homepage[1] agrees:
Btrfs is under heavy development, and is not suitable for any uses other
than benchmarking and review. The Btrfs disk format is not yet
finalized.
This is not something we want to release in stable. Remove
* Riku Voipio [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:23:12 +0200]:
btrfs-source package descripttion states, and homepage[1] agrees:
Btrfs is under heavy development, and is not suitable for any uses other
than benchmarking and review. The Btrfs disk format is not yet
finalized.
This is
Adeodato Simó wrote:
I know Daniel doesn't agree, so I'll wait a couple days before
proceeding with the removal in case he wants to provide a good rationale
as for why this package (in its current version) should be part of a
stable Debian release. Daniel?
since the description clearly states
* Daniel Baumann [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:24:14 +0100]:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
I know Daniel doesn't agree, so I'll wait a couple days before
proceeding with the removal in case he wants to provide a good rationale
as for why this package (in its current version) should be part of a
stable
7 matches
Mail list logo
