Bug#505536: ekiga: Please symlink identical GNOME help files

2008-11-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello, thanks for applying this in experimental. However, you forgot to add the fdupes build dependency to debian/control.in. diff -u ekiga-2.0.12/debian/control ekiga-2.0.12/debian/control --- ekiga-2.0.12/debian/control.in +++ ekiga-2.0.12/debian/control.in @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@

Bug#505536: ekiga: Please symlink identical GNOME help files

2008-11-17 Thread Eugen Dedu
Fixed on alioth, hence available on the next release, thanks and sorry for the error! For info, I don't think this fix is appropriate for unstable, as shown in the freeze guidelines email: A new version may only contain changes falling in one of the following categories (compared to the

Bug#505536: ekiga: Please symlink identical GNOME help files

2008-11-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Eugen, Eugen Dedu [2008-11-17 10:22 +0100]: Fixed on alioth, hence available on the next release, thanks and sorry for the error! Thanks! For info, I don't think this fix is appropriate for unstable I agree. Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu

Bug#505536: ekiga: Please symlink identical GNOME help files

2008-11-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: ekiga Version: 2.0.12-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch jaunty Hello, currently the ekiga package ships a lot of GNOME help images which are in translation directories, but are not actually translated, just copies of the English

Bug#505536: ekiga: Please symlink identical GNOME help files

2008-11-13 Thread Eugen Dedu
Martin Pitt wrote: Package: ekiga Version: 2.0.12-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch jaunty Hello, currently the ekiga package ships a lot of GNOME help images which are in translation directories, but are not actually translated, just

Bug#505536: ekiga: Please symlink identical GNOME help files

2008-11-13 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008, Eugen Dedu wrote: Do you have an elegant solution (for ex. without depending on fdupes) to include it upstream? Just FYI, this is now done in cdbs' debhelper.mk in Ubuntu's cdbs, and I think that makes more sense rather than duplicating this in all packages, however