On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 21:13 +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
> > Unless the unfreeze is indeed around the corner (unlikely with
> debian :)
>
> Ask me that again on Saturday (-;
Ever the romantic. ;-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon Feb 09 15:02, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Interesting... Never actually heard of this before, but you are right
> indeed. Ok then comes the question - may we have the deb file by some
> alternative means? Either experimental or a manual download...
We certainly could, however...
> Unless the
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:40 +0100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> How come 3 months later it is still not in unstable if it is ready to
>> go?
>
> My mentor advised me against importing into unstable prior to the
> release of Lenny, because if a security issue comes up before the
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:40 +0100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> How come 3 months later it is still not in unstable if it is ready to
> go?
My mentor advised me against importing into unstable prior to the
release of Lenny, because if a security issue comes up before then,
it'll be a mission to deal w
> This means you'll probably need to wait for Lenny to be released, and
> then for fsvs-1.1.17 (which is already packaged and ready to go) to
> find its way into lenny-backports.
How come 3 months later it is still not in unstable if it is ready to go?
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
5 matches
Mail list logo
