On Friday 26 December 2008 00:20, Julian Field wrote:
I'm afraid this is too late, mailscanner has already been
removed from lenny.
Shame you couldn't wait 6 days for the new stable release. I don't
immediately release a new stable release after making lots of changes to
ensure it has
On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
* Simon Waltersimon.wal...@hp-factory.de [2008-12-25 00:43]:
Gabor FUNKfunk.ga...@hunetkft.hu writes:
[...]
Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There
Hi,
* Simon Walter simon.wal...@hp-factory.de [2008-12-25 00:43]:
Gabor FUNK funk.ga...@hunetkft.hu writes:
[...]
Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There still need to be
done some testing with TNEF attachment,
Julian Field mailscan...@ecs.soton.ac.uk writes:
On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
I'm afraid this is too late, mailscanner has already been
removed from lenny.
Shame you couldn't wait 6 days for the new stable release. I don't
immediately release a new stable release after making lots of
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
mailscanner #506353
The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
Hi
Gabor FUNK funk.ga...@hunetkft.hu writes:
mailscanner #506353
The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
In the current state the package should not be part of
the lenny release.
I'm in no position to fix all this. I'm not familiar enough with
the MailScanner sourcecode and I'm
Hi,
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
xml2rfc #506652
The maintainer Florian Weimer:
This
7 matches
Mail list logo
