>> In Ubuntu I checked that the following packages builddepend on FPC:
>> lazarus
>> imapcopy
>> hedgewars
>> libhdate
>> gearhead
>> m-tx
>> python-soappy
>> poker-network
>> I assume, but have not check yet, that the same goes for Debian.
>
> Looks like quite a lot of packages seem to have go. T
reassign 506977 release.debian.org
thanks
On Thursday 27 November 2008 12:05, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > What is the correct way to remove packages from (old)stable? Should I
> > file a bug report against ftp.debian.org or is it done by the SRM?
>
> That's SRM stuff, so you need to file the bug
Hi,
Le mercredi 26 novembre 2008 à 10:42 -0600, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Package: fpc
> Version: 2.2.0-dfsg1-9
> Version: 2.0.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Thanks
>
> As can be read in the changelog of the latest version the old source of
> fpc has a copyright infringment:
> - Possible CodeGear Copyri
Paul Gevers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] Could you help by explaining what needs to be done
> (if anything) with the current old-stable, stable and testing sources?
> It looks like we should take this seriously, but I fear this is slightly
> above my head. Especially the fact that upstream re
took it very seriously.
Paul
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fpc/+bug/275688
Original Message
Subject: Bug#506977: FPC: copyright infringement in pre 2.2.2 sources
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:42:13 -0600
From: Paul Gevers
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fpc
Version
Package: fpc
Version: 2.2.0-dfsg1-9
Version: 2.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Thanks
As can be read in the changelog of the latest version the old source of
fpc has a copyright infringment:
- Possible CodeGear Copyright infringements in the source were reworked
using cleanroom approach.
Following the
6 matches
Mail list logo
