On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:54:01 +0100
"Ondřej Surý" wrote:
> lintian override would be more useful than adding useless
> ${misc:Depends} just because lintian is such a crybaby ;).
Um, it's better than that the way I did.
# but care about lintian clean is good way.
And for debian/watch, you can u
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) wrote:
>> Here's a patch to fix lintian warning and update watch file.
>> Could you apply it, please?
>
> what specific problems does this patch fix?
I can tell you that - none.
lintian override would be more u
Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) wrote:
> Here's a patch to fix lintian warning and update watch file.
> Could you apply it, please?
what specific problems does this patch fix?
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: unbound
Version: 1.0.2-1.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear unbound maintainers,
Here's a patch to fix lintian warning and update watch file.
Could you apply it, please?
- --
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp
http://
4 matches
Mail list logo