Bug#509397: pilrc: Should this package be removed?

2009-02-20 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello. On 15 February 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: * Inactive upstream. (Last upstream tarball was 2004). It's not really a problem. * Depends on Gtk1.2 which is scheduled for removal. But there's a patch which removes this dependency. Plus, the package description says: | PilRC

Bug#509397: pilrc: Should this package be removed?

2009-02-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
severity 509397 normal reassign 509397 ftp.debian.org retitle 509397 RM: pilrc -- RoM; dead upstream, outdated, depends on legacy libs thanks On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:51:08PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible

Bug#509397: pilrc: Should this package be removed?

2008-12-21 Thread Barry deFreese
Package: pilrc Version: 3.2-3 Severity: normal User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Inactive upstream. (Last upstream tarball was 2004). *