Bug#509480: kmd: Should this package be removed?

2009-02-09 Thread Jose M. Moya
The author does not plan to fix it in the near future and it is not easy to fix, so go ahead, remove it. regards, josem On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: severity 509480 normal reassign 509480 ftp.debian.org retitle 509480 RM: packagename -- RoQA;

Bug#509480: kmd: Should this package be removed?

2009-02-07 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
severity 509480 normal reassign 509480 ftp.debian.org retitle 509480 RM: packagename -- RoQA; outdated, dead upstream, depends on legacy libs, low popcon thanks If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please just close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other

Bug#509480: kmd: Should this package be removed?

2008-12-22 Thread Barry deFreese
Package: kmd Version: 0.9.19-1.1 Severity: normal User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Out of date. (Last maintainer upload in 2005). *