Bug#966273: Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2022-02-11 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 00:06:45 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > Control: retitle -1 RM: fam -- RoQA; replaced by gamin; unmaintained; > upstream dead > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > please remove fam. Upstream is long gone, and gamin is a maintained >

Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2021-01-31 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Helmut Grohne : > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Stefan Bühler wrote: > > I think fixing libgamin0.shlibs and dropping fam from the archives is > > the smoothest path to fixing this mess. > > Well, yeah. Removing fam removes the whole mess of compatibility. #966273 has become RM:

Bug#966273: Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2021-01-31 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 RM: fam -- RoQA; replaced by gamin; unmaintained; upstream dead Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Dear ftpmasters, please remove fam. Upstream is long gone, and gamin is a maintained drop in alternative. The previous Debian maintainer of fam has

Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2020-10-22 Thread Glenn Strauss
cross-posting to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966273 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510368 stbuehler wrote: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966273 > Is there any reason to keep FAM around any longer in your opinion, > given upstream

Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2020-08-09 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: severity -1 serious On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Stefan Bühler wrote: > This is an actual problem, as libfam0 doesn't provide the FAMNoExists > symbol, but programs building against libgamin-dev might detect the > symbol as available and use it. I concur. > So libfam0

Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2020-08-07 Thread Stefan Bühler
Hi, On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:46:05 +0100 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008, Andres Mejia wrote: > > The libfam shlib entry in libgamin0 is wrongly set to libfam0. Since > > libgamin > > is provided as a replacement for libfam, the entry should be set to > > libgamin0.

Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2009-01-01 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008, Andres Mejia wrote: The libfam shlib entry in libgamin0 is wrongly set to libfam0. Since libgamin is provided as a replacement for libfam, the entry should be set to libgamin0. This is a problem for packages that build depend on libgamin-dev since their dependency on

Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

2008-12-31 Thread Andres Mejia
Package: libgamin0 Version: 0.1.9-2 Severity: important Tags: patch The libfam shlib entry in libgamin0 is wrongly set to libfam0. Since libgamin is provided as a replacement for libfam, the entry should be set to libgamin0. This is a problem for packages that build depend on libgamin-dev