Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-07 Thread José Luis Tallón
Niko Tyni wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: The attached new patch seems to work for me, but please verify. It uses ucf for config file handling, which simplifies things IMO. I'm attaching an improved version that handles listen_port better.

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-07 Thread José Luis Tallón
Niko Tyni wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:22:46AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: I still don't see this new version anywhere. Are you aware that the release is scheduled eight days from now? FIXED. The enclosed patch (also available at my repo) is the latest version. It does work in

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-07 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 03:32:15PM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: Niko Tyni wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:22:46AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: I still don't see this new version anywhere. Are you aware that the release is scheduled eight days from now? FIXED. The enclosed

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-07 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 05:32:52PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: Your change to the postrm script makes it fail at purge if ucf is not present any more. You shouldn't use '' with 'set -e' here: Uh, I'm wrong here. Sorry about that. It always seemed counterintuitive me that 'false true' will not

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-07 Thread José Luis Tallón
Niko Tyni wrote: On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 05:32:52PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: Your change to the postrm script makes it fail at purge if ucf is not present any more. You shouldn't use '' with 'set -e' here: Uh, I'm wrong here. Sorry about that. It always seemed counterintuitive me

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-07 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 05:13:58PM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: Niko Tyni wrote: The debian/test thing is just cosmetic, so I'll look at uploading your version tonight unless someone else beats me to it. just remove it, of course :-) OK, did that and uploaded. By the way, I have

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-06 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:22:46AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: Niko Tyni wrote: I do intend to NMU this when I've had some sleep and can find the time for final tests. If somebody wants to take over, be my guest. I'd rather you uploaded my new version, based on the comments I got.

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-04 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:22:46AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: I do intend to NMU this when I've had some sleep and can find the time for final tests. If somebody wants to take over, be my guest. I'd rather you uploaded my new version, based on the comments I got. Real Life Keeps

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-04 Thread José Luis Tallón
Niko Tyni wrote: Do you mean 1.2.6-5 at http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/ dated 19-Jan-2009? As I noted before, it still overwrites user configuration, particularly listen_port, without warning, so it's not an acceptable fix for this bug. Of course not.

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-03 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: The attached new patch seems to work for me, but please verify. It uses ucf for config file handling, which simplifies things IMO. I'm attaching an improved version that handles listen_port better. I do intend to NMU this when I've

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-02-03 Thread José Luis Tallón
Niko Tyni wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: The attached new patch seems to work for me, but please verify. It uses ucf for config file handling, which simplifies things IMO. I'm attaching an improved version that handles listen_port better. I do

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-01-20 Thread Niko Tyni
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:12:25AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Any progress with this Release Critical bug? Ready to be uploaded, at: http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/up-imapproxy_1.2.6-5.dsc That still

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-01-18 Thread José Luis Tallón
Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Any progress with this Release Critical bug? Ready to be uploaded, at: http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/up-imapproxy_1.2.6-5.dsc Thank you to Niko Tyni and other contributors. Thanks to Christian for the other to upload.

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-01-18 Thread Christian Hammers
Am Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:14:42 +0100 schrieb José Luis Tallón jltal...@adv-solutions.net: Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Any progress with this Release Critical bug? diff attached for your review. I have already posted the URL for the already made package to the bug's address.

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-01-15 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello Any progress with this Release Critical bug? bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-01-03 Thread Matthew Johnson
We are BSPing in Cambridge this weekend, if you need this uploaded, let me know Matt -- Matthew Johnson signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-01-03 Thread José Luis Tallón
Matthew Johnson wrote: We are BSPing in Cambridge this weekend, if you need this uploaded, let me know Thanks. I think I can have the package fixed (and tested!) tonight. Will send the package's URL to the bug's address. Have fun, and kill many bugs :-) Cheers, J.L. -- To

Bug#510432: imapproxy

2009-01-03 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sat Jan 03 14:08, Matthew Johnson wrote: We are BSPing in Cambridge this weekend, if you need this uploaded, let me know Hmm... I sent this because bts.turmzimmer says: 10-Mar-2007: ifvoid: maintainer waiting for sponsor However, since the bug was added on 1st jan this seems unlikely (-: