On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:48:00AM -0600, Rene Mayorga wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 13 January 2009 16:43:55 Rene Mayorga wrote:
> > >> I was about to port this fix to 6.2.14-2, are everybody ok with this?
> >
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 January 2009 16:43:55 Rene Mayorga wrote:
> >> I was about to port this fix to 6.2.14-2, are everybody ok with this?
> >
> > FWIW: I'm ok with backporting this to the current version in Lenn
Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 16:43:55 Rene Mayorga wrote:
>> I was about to port this fix to 6.2.14-2, are everybody ok with this?
>
> FWIW: I'm ok with backporting this to the current version in Lenny.
Lenny should not be without it, good point. My comment referred to my
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 16:43:55 Rene Mayorga wrote:
> I was about to port this fix to 6.2.14-2, are everybody ok with this?
FWIW: I'm ok with backporting this to the current version in Lenny.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Rene Mayorga wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:24:27PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>> marcos.mar...@sonae.com wrote:
>>> Upstream has a fix for this:
>>> http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/changeset/16883
>> and they have introduced another since it may be "en- or decryption", not
>> only
>> "encr
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:24:27PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> marcos.mar...@sonae.com wrote:
> > Upstream has a fix for this:
> > http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/changeset/16883
>
> and they have introduced another since it may be "en- or decryption", not only
> "encryption" as their error mes
marcos.mar...@sonae.com wrote:
> Upstream has a fix for this:
> http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/changeset/16883
and they have introduced another since it may be "en- or decryption", not only
"encryption" as their error message indicates.
Whenever there is the next Debian release, this bug will be
Upstream has a fix for this:
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/changeset/16883
Best regards,
--
Marcos Marado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: boinc
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
I've been checking packages to see if they properly check the return
value of some of the functions in openssl. In lib/crypt.C there
is this code:
int decrypt_public(R_RSA_PUBLIC_KEY& key, DATA_BLOCK& in, DATA_BLOCK& out) {
RSA* rp = RSA_ne
9 matches
Mail list logo
