Hi Jonas,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:31:59PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:45:43PM +0100, Patrik Fimml wrote:
As a result of the mentioned discussion, I did some packaging work too
in July 2009, starting the repository from scratch, following some of
the
Hey,
I think we've encountered each other some while ago in a discussion with
mhatta about repackaging abiword using a git repository (which seems to
have died).
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 02:45:23PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Just adding the configure option --enable-libabiword is not
Hi Patrik, and others following this issue,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:45:43PM +0100, Patrik Fimml wrote:
Note that upstream doesn't track ABI changes through SONAME, which
would further complicate the packaging of libabiword.
Yes, I am aware of this.
Thanks for bringing it up here, though.
Hi,
Just adding the configure option --enable-libabiword is not sufficient
for official Debian packaging, as the resulting library is too
simplisticly built, not handling -fPIC flags and recompiling without
-fPIC for a static .a file as required by Debian Policy §10.2.
Upstream seems to be
4 matches
Mail list logo
