Hi,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:31:55AM +0100, Tomas Safarik wrote:
Package: iceowl
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: important
Hi,
I have the same problem as I had with iceowl 0.9 as I reported in bug #460547
.
I'll be happy to provide more info if needed.
Could you please recheck with 1.0b1?
Hello Alexnader,
I just want to ask if there is a known working patch for bug I reported
in Iceowl will it get into package or is there something that is
preventing it?
Thanks,
Tomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:51:04PM +0100, Immolo wrote:
After reading the other bug I managed to compile my own working copy
version of iceowl.
Follow this message for help on the matter:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460547#43
This sounds like a known issue. We should
After reading the other bug I managed to compile my own working copy
version of iceowl.
Follow this message for help on the matter:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460547#43
Immolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: iceowl
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: important
Hi,
I have the same problem as I had with iceowl 0.9 as I reported in bug #460547 .
I'll be happy to provide more info if needed.
Thank you
Tomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
5 matches
Mail list logo